Compare Activepieces vs Relay.app

Both tools in AI Workflow Automation
Pricing

Pricing Comparison

ActivepiecesActivepieces
Community Edition$0

Self-hosted under MIT licence, unlimited flows, unlimited runs, all core pieces

Cloud Free$0

Managed cloud, up to 10 active flows to start, AI credits included

Standard$5/active flow/mo

Unlimited runs per flow, AI agents, Tables, managed hosting

Ultimate$Custom

Annual contract, SSO, SCIM, audit logs, RBAC, governance and compliance controls

Relay.appRelay.app
Free$0

200 steps/month, 500 AI credits, 1 user, all integrations unlocked

Professional$19/mo

750 steps/month, 5,000 AI credits, 1 user, all features

Team$59/mo

2,000 steps/month, up to 10 users, shared workflows and app connections

Enterprise$Custom

Custom usage limits, custom integrations, automation consulting, dedicated Slack channel

Features

Feature Comparison

ActivepiecesActivepieces
MIT Open SourceFree Self-HostingPer-Flow PricingUnlimited Runs700+ PiecesVisual Flow BuilderAI AgentsMCP Server SupportCustom PiecesTypeScript SDKBranching LogicLoopsWebhooksHTTP RequestsActivepieces TablesEmbedded AutomationSSO and SCIMAudit Logs
Relay.appRelay.app
Human-in-the-Loop StepsApproval WorkflowsAI Chat BuilderVisual Workflow EditorAll Integrations IncludedAI AgentsMulti-Step WorkflowsConditional PathsWeb ScrapingAI Content GenerationShared App ConnectionsTeam WorkspacesWebhooksError DetectionData EnrichmentSlack ApprovalsWorkflow TemplatesSOC 2 Compliance
Fit

Best For & Not For

ActivepiecesActivepieces
✅ Best For
Teams migrating off task-based platforms whose bills climbed unpredictably, since per-flow pricing makes costs flat and forecastable regardless of run volume
Engineering-comfortable organisations that need data to stay on their own infrastructure for compliance, residency or security reasons
Startups embedding automation inside their own product, because the MIT licence and embedded offering permit commercial white-labelling without restriction
Developers who want to write custom pieces in TypeScript when no existing connector covers their internal tooling
❌ Not For
Teams needing the longest tail of niche SaaS connectors, since 700+ pieces is far short of Zapier's 9,000+
Non-technical users choosing self-hosting, because Docker deployment, updates, backups and SSL renewal fall on you
Organisations that need mature enterprise governance out of the box on the free tier, as SSO, SCIM, audit logs and RBAC sit behind the paid plan
Workflows that demand extremely low-latency execution, since per-task process isolation adds overhead compared to lighter engines
Relay.appRelay.app
✅ Best For
Operations and finance teams automating processes with real consequences, such as refunds, discounts or contract sends, where a human must approve before execution
Customer support leads who want AI to draft replies at scale while a person reviews tone and accuracy before anything reaches a customer
Small teams that want every integration unlocked from day one instead of discovering their key connector is behind a premium tier
Managers introducing automation into a risk-averse organisation, where visible approval gates are what make adoption politically possible
❌ Not For
High-volume automation users, since step limits are modest compared to competitors and heavy workloads outgrow the plans quickly
Teams needing the broadest connector library, because Relay covers roughly 100+ integrations versus thousands elsewhere
Anyone running credit-heavy AI workloads like image or video generation, which consume credits at a rate that makes budgeting difficult
Developers who want self-hosting, source access or deep custom code execution inside workflow steps
Availability

Platform & Accessibility

ActivepiecesActivepieces
web-baseddesktopapi
Relay.appRelay.app
web-basedapi
Use & Audience

Tasks & Who It's For

Integrations

Integrations

ActivepiecesActivepieces
Communication
SlackDiscord
Development
GitHub
Data & Spreadsheets
Google Sheets
Other
OpenAIAnthropic
Writing & Docs
Notion
Database
AirtableSupabase
CRM
HubSpot
Project Management
Linear
Webhooks & API
HTTP
Relay.appRelay.app
Communication
SlackGmail
CRM
HubSpotSalesforce
Writing & Docs
Notion
Database
Airtable
Data & Spreadsheets
Google Sheets
E-commerce
Stripe
Project Management
Linear
Other
OpenAIAnthropic
Webhooks & API
Webhooks
Use Cases

Real-world Use Cases

ActivepiecesActivepieces
1
Dinesh runs platform engineering at a 40-person SaaS company and moved 22 high-frequency automations off a task-billed tool onto self-hosted Activepieces, taking a $410 monthly automation bill down to the cost of one small server.
2
Klara works in compliance at a European insurer where customer data cannot touch third-party clouds. Self-hosted Activepieces let her team finally automate claims triage that legal had blocked for two years.
3
Nathan, an indie hacker, embedded Activepieces inside his own SaaS product so his customers can build their own integrations, and it became the feature that won him three enterprise deals.
Relay.appRelay.app
1
Ines heads finance ops at a 60-person SaaS company. Her Relay workflow drafts every refund over $200, pings her in Slack for one-click approval, then executes it in Stripe, cutting refund turnaround from four days to under an hour with zero unauthorised payouts.
2
Bram runs customer support at an online marketplace. AI drafts replies to routine tickets and his agents approve or edit them in Relay, letting a team of three handle the ticket volume that previously needed five.
3
Chidi manages content at a B2B agency. His workflow generates draft LinkedIn posts from published blog articles and holds them for the client's sign-off, which ended the endless email threads about approving copy.
Keep Exploring

Similar Comparisons